Author Topic: Folositi "Norton" ?  (Read 2038 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

enicolas

  • Guest
Folositi "Norton" ?
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday 15 February 2005, 10:59:18 »
[]


Offline laguna

  • new users
  • Joined: Dec 2004
  • Location: canada
  • Posts: 140
Folositi "Norton" ?
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday 15 February 2005, 14:11:45 »
Fiecare utilizeaza ce-i place si ce e capabil sa inteleaga. Utilizez NAV de cind a aparut si n-am avut nici cea mai mica problema...

Offline nicuprietenos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Joined: Apr 2004
  • Location: loco
  • Posts: 9.030
Folositi "Norton" ?
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday 15 February 2005, 14:30:53 »
Norton ---- de unde se blocheaza ca sa nu mai permita cookies??

adica nu am gasit setarea cu pricina, il folosesc de o saptamana
Be the person your dog thinks you are.


Offline snipper

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Joined: Apr 2004
  • Location: N51 W114
  • Posts: 547
  • #*@/:-))
Folositi "Norton" ?
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday 15 February 2005, 16:00:51 »
Quote from: nicuprietenos
Norton ---- de unde se blocheaza ca sa nu mai permita cookies??

adica nu am gasit setarea cu pricina, il folosesc de o saptamana


poate nu am inteles intrebarea... cookies se primesc/refuza automat/manual din setarile browser-ului (IE, Mozilla Firefox, Opera sau ce browser folosesti)

Offline ljian

  • new users
  • Joined: Aug 2004
  • Location: Toronto ON
  • Posts: 130
Folositi "Norton" ?
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday 15 February 2005, 16:29:43 »
Eu am instalat nav 2005 la firma .... si stinks rau de tot. Mananca din resurse ca porcul. Mailurile vin si se trimit mult mai incet ...
Si sa nu uit ... e super fun sa repornesti Windows de 2 ori pt un kkt de instalare... way 2 go!!! Ca sa nu mai zic de repornire ca vrem sa facem update! Si mai costa si  o caruta de bani (40EURO licenta)
Jaf la drumul mare
Am avut un NAV Corporate Edition din 2001 care mergea f bine.
"Testing can prove the existence of bugs, but never their absence"
Dijkstra