Author Topic: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...  (Read 191503 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline baluba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8.152
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #760 on: Friday 06 January 2012, 18:20:35 »
si hai sa nu comparam taxele pe care le platesc 'amerlocii" cu cele pe care le platesc 'canadezii" pentru intretinerea lor si a altora.

Sunteti on the hook pentru 2 milioane de welfaristi care sigur sunt mai scumpi decat veteranii.
A nu se mai folosi englezisme ca checks and balances, ci termeni puri romanesti ca cecuri si balante.


Offline cristav

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.104
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #761 on: Wednesday 07 March 2012, 18:27:56 »
pe ce-au aruncat astia miliarde.
kktul lor cu care iradiaza oamenii se pare ca e bun doar pentru gasit pampesii plini de pissat la  babe si copii, cine-i hotarat trece  :laugh:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2401276,00.asp
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2111417/TSA-nude-body-scanners-Jonathan-Corbett-video-exposes-loophole.html
da lobbyul sa traiasca ca trebuia sa manaca o paine si gura alora

Offline Ronin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Location: Caribbean
  • Posts: 25.326
  • no master
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #762 on: Wednesday 07 March 2012, 18:52:45 »
pe ce-au aruncat astia miliarde.
kktul lor cu care iradiaza oamenii se pare ca e bun doar pentru gasit pampesii plini de pissat la  babe si copii, cine-i hotarat trece  :laugh:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2401276,00.asp
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2111417/TSA-nude-body-scanners-Jonathan-Corbett-video-exposes-loophole.html
da lobbyul sa traiasca ca trebuia sa manaca o paine si gura alora
Nice, acum imi explic de ce nu au zis nimic cand am avut niste monezi uitate intr-un buzunar lateral la pantaloni cargo, pai era negru pe background negru, nu aveau cum sa detecteze pt. ca nu cauta metal, muwhahaha. Am mai spus-o ca aia de la TSA sunt retardati mintali si chiar angajeaza preponderent persoane cu handicap mental, se pare ca s-au molipsit si sunt toti retarzi.

Stai ca vine Baluba si ne iexplica binefacerile radiatilor moca courtesy of TSA.
You obey, u OK!

Churchill understood the choice perfectly: “The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.”!


test12345

  • Guest
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #763 on: Wednesday 07 March 2012, 22:45:31 »
uite balubo, ultima aberatie din lumea patentelor:

http://thetechjournal.com/internet/social-community/facebook-and-zynga-face-patent-infringement-accusation-for-their-virtual-commodities.xhtml

Quote

Furthermore, the claims cover the following in-game purchasing (software) method as reported by The Verge:
  • permitting a gamer to create an account;
  • determining if the gamer is eligible to purchase game objects;
  • setting a price for the game objects;
  • making sure the gamer’s account balance can cover the game objects;
  • offering a game object for purchase based on the status of the game and gamer; and
  • allowing the gamer to purchase the game object, and incorporating the object into the game, without interrupting the game action.

deci a crea un cont intr-un joc a devenit patent in 2011; patetic si aberant; oare judecatorii aia care acorda patentele astea traiesc printre noi?

a pune un pret este patent; sa-i vad pe astia de la amazon cat o sa plateasca pentru actiunea de pune pret la marfa

saracii de la assa-abloy au inventat ei incuietoarea, dar cineva o sa patenteze actiunea de deschidere a usii, si asa vezi ce o sa platim de cate ori vrem sa iesim din casa

Offline baluba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8.152
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #764 on: Friday 09 March 2012, 12:14:00 »
uite balubo, ultima aberatie din lumea patentelor:

http://thetechjournal.com/internet/social-community/facebook-and-zynga-face-patent-infringement-accusation-for-their-virtual-commodities.xhtml

deci a crea un cont intr-un joc a devenit patent in 2011; patetic si aberant; oare judecatorii aia care acorda patentele astea traiesc printre noi?

a pune un pret este patent; sa-i vad pe astia de la amazon cat o sa plateasca pentru actiunea de pune pret la marfa

saracii de la assa-abloy au inventat ei incuietoarea, dar cineva o sa patenteze actiunea de deschidere a usii, si asa vezi ce o sa platim de cate ori vrem sa iesim din casa


Eu nu pricep de ce se face atata caz de o acuzatie.
Asa si eu pot sa-mi charge vecinul ca mi-a suflat frunzele pe lawn, dar daca intru cu tampenii de genul asta in fata unui judge ma da afara cu frivolous lawsuit si ma pune sa platesc cheltuielile de deranj.
Daca aveai un caz in care cineva a castigat pe patente aiurea as mai zice, altfel tot ce incerci tu este sa aduci argumente false ca sa arati cat esti de oropsit.
A nu se mai folosi englezisme ca checks and balances, ci termeni puri romanesti ca cecuri si balante.


test12345

  • Guest
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #765 on: Friday 09 March 2012, 14:59:37 »
eu nu sunt oropsit balubo;

pai vezi tu ca tocmai asta e problema ca un judje a primit o astfel de cerere si mai rau e ca patentele se acorda pentru idei nu pentru realizari;
ca sa nu mai zicem ca firma care a primit patentul si care i-a chemat in judecata pe aia e inchisa de ani buni de zile;

Offline tornado_old

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Location: La Habana
  • Posts: 17.925
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #766 on: Friday 09 March 2012, 15:14:34 »
eu nu sunt oropsit balubo;

pai vezi tu ca tocmai asta e problema ca un judje a primit o astfel de cerere si mai rau e ca patentele se acorda pentru idei nu pentru realizari;

 Mi-a placut ca ai scris in banatzeneshte.

I Translate it

Offline Dorel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17.617
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #767 on: Friday 09 March 2012, 15:16:31 »

 Mi-a placut ca ai scris in banatzeneshte.
pai au inceput sa se dea pe brazda  8)


Offline baluba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8.152
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #768 on: Friday 09 March 2012, 15:37:41 »
eu nu sunt oropsit balubo;

pai vezi tu ca tocmai asta e problema ca un judje a primit o astfel de cerere si mai rau e ca patentele se acorda pentru idei nu pentru realizari;
ca sa nu mai zicem ca firma care a primit patentul si care i-a chemat in judecata pe aia e inchisa de ani buni de zile;


Un judje care primeste o plangere nu e o problema, nu te mai ingrijora din cauza asta.
Da, patentele se acorda pe idei si nu pe forma lor fizica. De aia ii zice proprietate intelectuala.
A nu se mai folosi englezisme ca checks and balances, ci termeni puri romanesti ca cecuri si balante.

test12345

  • Guest
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #769 on: Friday 09 March 2012, 16:51:44 »
A patent is a form of intellectual property. It consists of a set of exclusive rights granted by a sovereign state to an inventor or their assignee for a limited period of time in exchange for the public disclosure of an invention.

deci tre sa inventezi ceva, inventia este o chestie care are cap si coada, are un scop si eventual o utilitate; inventia este un rezultat nu este o idee;
ideea poate sa fie inventiva, metaforic vorbind, dar asta nu o face inventie

idei au multi , cu finalitatea stau prost;

eu sper ca astia de la apple platesc la fiecare tableta pe aia de au facut star-trek ca ei au introdus prima oara tableta; ideea le apartine; si mai nasol e ca si alea din film tot dreptunghiulare erau, deci e o problema cu cererea lu apple pentru un patent pe forma dreptunghiulara. ca sa nu mai zicem ca si alea erau tot touch-screen judecand dupa cum le foloseau.

Offline maestro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Location: Hamilton
  • Posts: 8.250
  • Am o teava mititica...
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #770 on: Friday 09 March 2012, 17:26:19 »
....
eu sper ca astia de la apple platesc la fiecare tableta pe aia de au facut star-trek ca ei au introdus prima oara tableta; ideea le apartine; si mai nasol e ca si alea din film tot dreptunghiulare erau, deci e o problema cu cererea lu apple pentru un patent pe forma dreptunghiulara. ca sa nu mai zicem ca si alea erau tot touch-screen judecand dupa cum le foloseau.

Dar nu le-au patentat. Jean-Luc a pierdut trenul.


In anii '90, prietenul meu Jo Klieber ( http://www.syntace.de/index.cfm?pid=2 ) din Tacherting, Bayern a creat primele ghidoane pozitionate longitudinal bicicletei ( http://www.syntace.de/index.cfm?pid=3&pk=1445 )

Doi ani mai tirziu a intrat in proces cu Scott care avea patent pe....pozitia coatelor !!!! Au cazut la pace pentru un % din vinzari.



Duritatea untului este proportionala cu prospetimea piinii!

Offline baluba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8.152
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #771 on: Friday 09 March 2012, 18:09:17 »
eu sper ca astia de la apple platesc la fiecare tableta pe aia de au facut star-trek ca ei au introdus prima oara tableta; ideea le apartine; si mai nasol e ca si alea din film tot dreptunghiulare erau, deci e o problema cu cererea lu apple pentru un patent pe forma dreptunghiulara. ca sa nu mai zicem ca si alea erau tot touch-screen judecand dupa cum le foloseau.

Daca trivializam indeajuns ne ies toate argumentele.
Unde scrie ca Apple are patent pe forma dreptunghiulara?
A nu se mai folosi englezisme ca checks and balances, ci termeni puri romanesti ca cecuri si balante.


Offline Dorel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17.617
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #772 on: Friday 09 March 2012, 18:46:25 »
Maistrule, ca tot le stii pe toate : are masonii patentu lui Traian Vuia ? Ca de fapt de asta latzi corupt sa intre in organizatzia voastra ? Fratzii wright au fost primii dar voi masonii atzi facut deja planul de backup !!! Va citesc fara ochelari

Offline fenderguitars

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33.274
  • Use It.
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #773 on: Friday 09 March 2012, 18:50:33 »
Da Vlaicu are patent pe glider ?
in loc sa se duca sa se inregistreze, umbla aiurea sa treaca Carpatii.
I will never forget the anger of the adults in the room when I said this, they wanted to believe so badly they were willing to forgot all sense of rational and critical thinking.

Offline cristav

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.104
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #774 on: Sunday 11 March 2012, 20:00:00 »
campionii democratiei: HR 347 - Trespass Bill
de joi protestul devine delict federal!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KAOn2dX8nw
a dracu cum au trecut-o si pe asta pe sub masa ca pe ACTA, iar mass-media cica libera n-a zis nici pas.

Offline tornado_old

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Location: La Habana
  • Posts: 17.925
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #775 on: Sunday 11 March 2012, 20:13:29 »
Daca trivializam indeajuns ne ies toate argumentele.
Unde scrie ca Apple are patent pe forma dreptunghiulara?

 Pai de aia s-au razboit amerlocii cu Samsung , pt forma dreptunghiulara a galaxy-ului.
 
"
Court cases are rarely funny things but the ongoing battle between Apple and Samsung - the former claims the latter has been copying everything from its hardware to its packaging - has thrown up some unexpected humour: in order to refute Samsung's argument that tablets will inevitably look very similar to one another, Apple has been forced to come up with a list of alternative designs.
According to Apple, Samsung could easily create a tablet that doesn't rip off the iPad by using some of the following ideas:
 
  • Front surfaces that aren't black
  • Front surfaces that don't have rounded corners
  • Screens that aren't centred
  • Making screens that are more square, or "not rectangular at all"
  • Screens that aren't flat
  • Frames that aren't thin
  • "A cluttered appearance"
 
http://www.comparetablets.co.uk/apple-to-samsung-dont-make-square-tablets/
« Last Edit: Sunday 11 March 2012, 20:15:21 by tornado »

Massther Clinic - Massage therapy

Offline baluba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8.152
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #776 on: Sunday 11 March 2012, 20:36:28 »
de joi protestul devine delict federal!

 :laugh:
Cum ai ajuns la concluzia asta ca tot ce spune actul ala e ca daca impiedici functionarul sa-si desfasoare activitatea(patrunda in cladire) esti in wrong?
De protestat din gura actul nu zice nimic.
 
SEC. 2. RESTRICTED BUILDING OR GROUNDS.
[/size]
Section 1752 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to
read as follows:
[/b]
‘‘§ 1752. Restricted building or grounds
[/size]
‘‘(a) Whoever—
‘‘(1) knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building
or grounds without lawful authority to do so;
‘‘(2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the
orderly conduct of Government business or official functions,
engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such
proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so
that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly
conduct of Government business or official functions;
‘‘(3) knowingly, and with the intent to impede or disrupt
the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions,
obstructs or impedes ingress or egress to or from any restricted
building or grounds; or
‘‘(4) knowingly engages in any act of physical violence
against any person or property in any restricted building or
grounds;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished as provided

in subsection (b).
 
 
A nu se mai folosi englezisme ca checks and balances, ci termeni puri romanesti ca cecuri si balante.

Offline Ronin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Location: Caribbean
  • Posts: 25.326
  • no master
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #777 on: Wednesday 14 March 2012, 13:46:25 »
Baluba nu intelege nici iexplicatia pe text, vai de noi, nu ca el ar avea ceva de protestat ever sau stie ce e ala First Amendment.

Dar sa revenim, azi o scrisorica de la un fost executive director la Goldman Sachs.
"Why I Am Leaving Goldman Sachs

TODAY is my last day at Goldman Sachs. After almost 12 years at the firm — first as a summer intern while at Stanford, then in New York for 10 years, and now in London — I believe I have worked here long enough to understand the trajectory of its culture, its people and its identity. And I can honestly say that the environment now is as toxic and destructive as I have ever seen it.
"
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/opinion/why-i-am-leaving-goldman-sachs.html?_r=2
« Last Edit: Wednesday 14 March 2012, 13:50:34 by Ronin »
You obey, u OK!

Churchill understood the choice perfectly: “The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.”!

Offline Ronin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Location: Caribbean
  • Posts: 25.326
  • no master
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #778 on: Wednesday 14 March 2012, 13:50:03 »
Misto si un comentaru la articolul din NY Times.


 "Thank you, Greg for speaking out. I have been a Goldman client since 2006, and have been trying to get my money out for several years now, to no avail. My money was placed in proprietary funds that have under-performed other similar investments and were clearly designed to maximize Goldman's profit at my expense. I am not allowed to get money out of these investments, in some cases for up to 8-10 years, without a significant "haircut" (hmmm, I wonder if Goldman partners profit from the haircut??).

In one of these investments (which has lost 35% of its value since 2008), Goldman even refuses to provide basic information, like estimates of income or expenses for tax planning purposes. I literally have to guess the income my K-1 will show when I file my taxes in April, because Goldman won't even give me an estimate (much less quarterly or annual commentary or disclosure by the fund managers). In many years, the fund shows substantial interest income (on which I have to pay taxes), but none of that income is ever distributed to me and the NAV of the fund simultaneously goes down. Where did the income go? When asked, Goldman refuses to provide specifics (even though I am a limited partner of the investment partnership and have a right to this information).

It is amazing how little Goldman cares about its customers. Goldman exists for the sole purpose of enriching its partners.
"

Raspunsul bancii te lasa masca.

"In response, Goldman Sachs denied that Smith was giving an accurate view of life at the company.

"We disagree with the views expressed, which we don't think reflect the way we run our business. In our view, we will only be successful if our clients are successful. This fundamental truth lies at the heart of how we conduct ourselves," the bank said."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/mar/14/goldman-sachs-director-quits-morally-bankrupt


Cam astis sunt stapanii lui Baluba, nu poate sa ne mai mire nimic.
You obey, u OK!

Churchill understood the choice perfectly: “The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.”!

Offline tornado_old

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Location: La Habana
  • Posts: 17.925
Re: Sa ne radem, azi iar US...
« Reply #779 on: Wednesday 14 March 2012, 13:57:36 »
Astia ar trebui sa isi schimbe numele in "Camatarii Goldman si Sachs" .